Strouse v. Barone

Full title: VINCENT STROUSE, Plaintiff v. MAJOR MICHAEL BARONE, Security Major at SCI…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-8J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-8J.

September 25, 2006

ORDER

KIM GIBSON, District Judge

AND NOW, this 25^th day of September, 2006, after the plaintiff, Vincent Strouse, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted as to Defendants Seymore and Guelich. The motion is denied as to the remaining defendants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.