Opinion
No. 3D23-0734
08-09-2023
Bill STROUD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Bill Stroud, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Lower Tribunal Nos. F19-4950, F19-4952, F19-13087, F18-18896, F19-7351, F18-22274, F19-4953, F19-5181, F19-4951.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.
Bill Stroud, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Lopez v. State, 2 So. 3d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ("It is clear in the case law of this state that double jeopardy challenges to convictions are not cognizable under [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.800(a)."); Ramirez v. State, 374 So.3d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 31, 2022) ("A motion to correct illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a) is not cognizable where, as here, the defendant seeks to challenge the validity of the conviction and, only by extension, the ‘legality’ of the resulting sentence."); Kingry v. State, 28 So. 3d 173, 174 (Fla. 1st DCA.2010) ("Having freely and voluntarily entered into [a plea] agreement and accepted its benefits, appellant may not now seek to be relieved of one of the burdens imposed upon him pursuant to the agreement.").