From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stroud v. Lewisburg

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 25, 2022
1:22-cv-0515 (M.D. Pa. May. 25, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-0515

05-25-2022

MARCUS STROUD, Plaintiff v. WARDEN USP LEWISBURG, et al., Defendants


ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, on this 25th day of May 2022, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff Marcus Stroud's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED.
2. Stroud's complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as follows:
a. Stroud's equal protection claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
b. All other claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. Stroud may file an amended complaint in conformity with the accompanying Memorandum by no later than June 17, 2022. If no amended complaint is timely filed, this case will be closed.


Summaries of

Stroud v. Lewisburg

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
May 25, 2022
1:22-cv-0515 (M.D. Pa. May. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Stroud v. Lewisburg

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS STROUD, Plaintiff v. WARDEN USP LEWISBURG, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 25, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-0515 (M.D. Pa. May. 25, 2022)