From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strongbow Consulting Group LLC v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 17, 2021
No. 2021-03929 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2021-03929 Index 651218/20

06-17-2021

Strongbow Consulting Group LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Defendant-Respondent. Appeal No. 14097 No. 2020-03835

Capuder Fazio Giacoia LLP, New York (Douglas Capuder of counsel), for appellant. Venable LLP, New York (Lawrence H. Cooke II of counsel), for respondent.


Capuder Fazio Giacoia LLP, New York (Douglas Capuder of counsel), for appellant.

Venable LLP, New York (Lawrence H. Cooke II of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, González, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joel Cohen, J.), entered on or about August 18, 2020, which, inter alia, granted defendant's motion to stay the action and refer all claims to arbitration and denied plaintiff's cross motion for expedited discovery and a jury trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Where, as here, the parties have a broad arbitration clause and the rules under which they agree to arbitrate provide for the arbitrator to decide arbitrability, those issues are not for the court (Zachariou v Manios, 68 A.D.3d 539 [1st Dept 2009]). The court's role in such a case is solely to ascertain that a valid agreement to arbitrate has been reached, applying contract law principles (see Chelsea Sq. Textiles, Inc. v Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co., 189 F.3d 289, 295—296 [2d Cir 1999]). Plaintiff's contentions all go to the scope of the arbitration clause, not its existence or validity. Thus, the matter was properly sent to arbitration, and the action stayed.

Plaintiff also complained that defendant offered a 2018 nondisclosure agreement for the first time in reply. However, plaintiff did not object to the discussion or consideration of the agreement. Furthermore, given that defendant argued solely on the face of that agreement, the argument could have been raised for the first time, even on appeal (Chateau D' If Corp. v City of New York, 219 A.D.2d 205, 209 [1st Dept 1996], lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 811 [1996]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Strongbow Consulting Group LLC v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 17, 2021
No. 2021-03929 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Strongbow Consulting Group LLC v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Case Details

Full title:Strongbow Consulting Group LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-03929 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)