From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strong v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Jan 8, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 3:19-CV-1132-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 8, 2020)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 3:19-CV-1132-JD-MGG

01-08-2020

LEVENTES AVERY STRONG, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Levantes Avery Strong, Jr., a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the disciplinary decision (WCC 19-8-314) at the Westville Correctional Facility in which a disciplinary hearing officer (DHO) found him guilty of battery in violation of Indiana Department of Correction Offense 212. Following a disciplinary hearing, he was sanctioned with a loss of ninety days earned credit time and a demotion in credit class. Pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4, the court must dismiss the petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court."

Significantly, Strong acknowledges that the Indiana Department of Correction has vacated the disciplinary sanctions and has set the matter for a rehearing. ECF 1-1 at 8. Because the petition challenges the procedures and determinations of the initial proceedings, the court finds that the claims raised in the petition are moot. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003) (prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement).

Because Strong is not entitled to habeas relief, the petition is denied. If Strong wants to appeal this decision, he does not need a certificate of appealability because he is challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. See Evans v. Circuit Court, 569 F.3d 665, 666 (7th Cir. 2009). However, he may not proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal in this case could not be taken in good faith.

For these reasons, the court:

(1) DENIES the habeas corpus petition (ECF 1);

(2) WAIVES the filing fee;

(3) DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment and close this case; and

(4) DENIES Leventes Avery Strong, Jr., leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

SO ORDERED on January 8, 2020

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Strong v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Jan 8, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 3:19-CV-1132-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Strong v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:LEVENTES AVERY STRONG, JR., Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2020

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 3:19-CV-1132-JD-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 8, 2020)