Opinion
No. CR 06-1346.
Opinion delivered May 17, 2007.
ATTORNEY CLIENT — CONFLICT OF INTEREST — MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF, GRANTED — MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED. — Where appellant had filed a complaint against his attorney with the Committee on Professional Conduct, the supreme court granted his attorney's motion for extension of time to file a brief but denied his motion to withdraw; however, a subsequent motion to withdraw will be considered if an entry of appearance of new counsel, an affidavit of indigency, or a petition to appear pro se are submitted simultaneously with a motion to withdraw.
Second Motion to Withdraw or, in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief; motion to withdraw denied; motion for extension of time to file brief granted.
Randel Miller, for appellant.
No response.
On April 20, 2007, Randel Miller, attorney for Appellant Richard Strong, filed a second motion to withdraw or, in the alternative, a motion for extension of time to file a brief. In his motion, Miller claimed that "a conflict has recently arisen between counsel and [Appellant]" that would require his withdrawal from the case. Miller stated that Appellant filed a complaint against him with the Committee on Professional Conduct, but Miller did not attach such an exhibit to his motion. Miller now requests that we grant his motion to withdraw.
Rule 16 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure — Criminal provides:
(a) Trial counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. After the notice of appeal of a judgment of conviction has been filed, the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.
The United States Supreme Court recognized in Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978), that defense counsel is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when a conflict of interest exists or will probably develop in the course of a trial. The Supreme Court also stated in Holloway that defense attorneys have the obligation to advise the court at once upon discovering a conflict of interest. See id. [1] Here, we grant Miller's motion for extension of time to file a brief and order him to file a brief within thirty days. We deny Miller's motion to withdraw at this time. However, we will consider a subsequent motion to withdraw if an entry of appearance of new counsel, an affidavit of indigency, or a petition to appear pro se are submitted simultaneously with a motion to withdraw. These motions must be filed within thirty days of this order.
Motion to withdraw denied; motion for extension of time granted.