From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strong v. Florida Parole Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 2005
916 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 1D05-2319.

December 9, 2005.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original Jurisdiction.

Michael A. Strong, pro se, petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Terri Leon-Benner, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.


As the Florida Parole Commission subsequently restored petitioner to supervision, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied as moot. To the extent that petitioner argues that he was never released from custody and was erroneously alleged to have violated his conditional release supervision, this issue was not presented to the circuit court and, therefore, cannot be addressed in this proceeding. See, e.g., Perez v. Winn-Dixie, 639 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Parlier v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., 622 So.2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (stating that as a general rule of appellate procedure, based on a practical necessity and fairness to the opposing party and the circuit judge, issues that are not timely raised before the circuit court will not be considered on appeal).

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Strong v. Florida Parole Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 2005
916 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Strong v. Florida Parole Comm

Case Details

Full title:Michael A. STRONG, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 9, 2005

Citations

916 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)