Opinion
Decided October 2, 1992
The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 435, is granted, limited to the following question:
"Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly place the burden on the conservation commission to establish that no feasible and prudent alternative existed to the plaintiffs' application?"
James E. Mattern, in support of the petition.