From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strong v. Blake

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Apr 11, 1956
231 F.2d 447 (1st Cir. 1956)

Summary

In Strong v. Blake, 46 Barb. 228, the rule is laid down that "In order to constitute a valid tender, it must be proved that there was a production of the money and an actual offer of it to the creditor; unless it be shown that the latter dispensed with it by some positive act or declaration."

Summary of this case from Link v. Mack

Opinion

No. 5084.

April 11, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; Charles Edward Wyzanski, Jr., Judge.

George C. Strong, pro se.

Andrew A. Caffrey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., with whom Anthony Julian, U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellees.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the District Court of December 14, 1955, and the order of that Court of January 13, 1956, denying motion for rehearing, are affirmed.


Summaries of

Strong v. Blake

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Apr 11, 1956
231 F.2d 447 (1st Cir. 1956)

In Strong v. Blake, 46 Barb. 228, the rule is laid down that "In order to constitute a valid tender, it must be proved that there was a production of the money and an actual offer of it to the creditor; unless it be shown that the latter dispensed with it by some positive act or declaration."

Summary of this case from Link v. Mack
Case details for

Strong v. Blake

Case Details

Full title:George C. STRONG, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. William J. BLAKE, etc., et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1956

Citations

231 F.2d 447 (1st Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Peckham v. Stewart

The demurrer should have been sustained, as the complaint fails to allege an actual tender of the money due…

Oullahan v. Baldwin

It was the duty of the purchaser to have the money there, and offer the money. (Englander v. Rogers , 41 Cal.…