From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strong v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 0:09-2101-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 0:09-2101-RMG

02-23-2012

Martha Strong, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for an award of attorney's fees as a prevailing party in a Social Security disability matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 32). Plaintiff requests Court approval of $8,728.50, which represents a fee of 25% of Plaintiff's total recovery of $34,914.00. Plaintiff advises the Court that she and her counsel had a contingent fee agreement providing for an attorney's fee of 25% of the amount recovered. Plaintiff's counsel has provided to the Court an accounting of his hours of 46.2 hours, which represents a proposed hourly rate of $ 188.93 per hour. Plaintiff's counsel further informs the Court that he has already received payment in the amount of $5,917.00 and, thus, seeks an additional payment of the balance of $2,811.50. (Dkt. No. 32-1 at 8-9). Defendant has no objection to the award of attorney's fees as requested by Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 36).

The Court, pursuant to Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 897-808 (2002), begins this review by determining the fee provided for by the contingency fee agreement and tests this against a standard of reasonableness. The fee requested of $8,728.50 is in accord with the parties' contingency fee agreement. Based upon the hours expended and other factors normally considered in reviewing the reasonableness of an attorney's fee, the Court finds the fee requested is reasonable. Barber v. Kimbrell 's, 577 F.2d 216, 226 (4th Cir. 1978). Therefore, the Court hereby approves an attorney's fee of $8,728.50, subject to a reduction for the amount already paid of $5,917.00, making the net amount now due for the attorney's fee of $2,811.50.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Richard Mark Gergel

United States District Judge

Charleston, South Carolina

February 23, 2012


Summaries of

Strong v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 0:09-2101-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Strong v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Martha Strong, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 0:09-2101-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2012)