From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stromski v. Findley

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jul 14, 2005
Civil No. 02-1636-CO (D. Or. Jul. 14, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-1636-CO.

July 14, 2005


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 21, 2005. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Stromski v. Findley

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Jul 14, 2005
Civil No. 02-1636-CO (D. Or. Jul. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Stromski v. Findley

Case Details

Full title:BARTON ANTHONY STROMSKI and JACKIE LYNN CLARK-STROMSKI, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jul 14, 2005

Citations

Civil No. 02-1636-CO (D. Or. Jul. 14, 2005)