From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strojnik v. The Victus Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 14, 2021
1:18-cv-01620-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-01620-AWI-SKO

09-14-2021

PETER STROJNIK, SR. Plaintiff, v. THE VICTUS GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

(Doc. 21)

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, in which he notifies the Court of the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Doc. 21.) Plaintiff filed this notice before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. As such, Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this matter with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL CLOSE the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strojnik v. The Victus Grp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 14, 2021
1:18-cv-01620-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Strojnik v. The Victus Grp.

Case Details

Full title:PETER STROJNIK, SR. Plaintiff, v. THE VICTUS GROUP, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-01620-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2021)