From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strojnik v. Kapalua Land Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 25, 2019
CV 19-00077-SOM-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 25, 2019)

Opinion

CV 19-00077-SOM-KJM

09-25-2019

PETER STROJNIK, Plaintiff, v. KAPALUA LAND COMPANY LTD, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on September 25, 2019, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendations To Dismiss Action", ECF No. [43] are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 25, 2019.

/s/ Susan Oki Mollway

Susan Oki Mollway

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Strojnik v. Kapalua Land Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 25, 2019
CV 19-00077-SOM-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Strojnik v. Kapalua Land Co.

Case Details

Full title:PETER STROJNIK, Plaintiff, v. KAPALUA LAND COMPANY LTD, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Sep 25, 2019

Citations

CV 19-00077-SOM-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 25, 2019)

Citing Cases

Langer v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of Cal.

By contrast, a plaintiff who fails to allege any connection between the website barriers and a physical…

Gomez v. Skip Keyser Realty, Inc.

See, e.g, Cullen v. Netflix, 880 F.Supp.2d 1017 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (holding Title III of ADA did not apply to…