From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stringham v. CDC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-04-1530-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1530-JAM-GGH P.

October 22, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 22, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. The entity defendants' supplemental motion for summary judgment, filed on 10/02/07, as to remaining ADA injunctive relief claims is granted and judgment is to be entered for defendants.


Summaries of

Stringham v. CDC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-04-1530-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Stringham v. CDC

Case Details

Full title:GUY T. STRINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. CDC, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1530-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)