From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STRINGHAM v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 2:05-cv-0644 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:05-cv-0644 FCD GGH P.

November 5, 2007


ORDER


Defendants filed a request for an extension of time to file a reply to plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion. Because it appeared that no proposed order in wordperfect format was processed to chambers via email, this court issued an order indicating that defendants had failed to fully comply with Local Rule 5-137(b). However, it appears that defendants had properly emailed the original proposed order and due to an internal error by court staff, it was not processed properly.

Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted an additional fifteen days, to and including November 21, 2007, to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.


Summaries of

STRINGHAM v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 5, 2007
CASE NO.: 2:05-cv-0644 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)
Case details for

STRINGHAM v. BICK

Case Details

Full title:GUY T. STRINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. J. BICK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 5, 2007

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:05-cv-0644 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2007)