From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stringfellow v. McGinness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2988 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2988 GEB GGH P

09-21-2011

ROBERT LEE STRINGFELLOW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McGINNESS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2011, the undersigned issued a discovery and scheduling order with respect to several defendants that had answered the complaint. On September 19, 2011, defendant Total Renal Care, incorrectly identified as Davita Dialysis, answered the complaint

Therefore the August 10, 2011 order, shall be applied to Total Renal Care, except that: The parties may conduct discovery until January 16, 2012. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date.

All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before April 13, 2012. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this court's order filed May 3, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Stringfellow v. McGinness

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2988 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Stringfellow v. McGinness

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE STRINGFELLOW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McGINNESS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2988 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)