From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stringer v. Sherman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 10, 2015
CV 13-9369-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2015)

Opinion

          Jonzel Stringer, Petitioner, Pro se, Corcoran, CA.

          For Stu Sherman, (Acting Warden), Respondent: Timothy M Weiner, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Stringer v. Sherman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 10, 2015
CV 13-9369-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Stringer v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:JONZEL STRINGER, Petitioner, v. STU SHERMAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 10, 2015

Citations

CV 13-9369-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2015)