From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Mar 25, 2019
Case No: 5:19-cv-102-Oc-30PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Case No: 5:19-cv-102-Oc-30PRL

03-25-2019

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 76.26.254.240 Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, as the alleged owner of the copyrights for motion pictures distributed through the Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, and Vixen adult brands, seeks permission to serve Comcast Cable, the defendant's alleged Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), with a subpoena before the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference. (Doc. 8). With an assumption that the subscriber is the infringer, it alleges the defendant, known to it only by an internet protocol ("IP") address, infringed its copyright by using BitTorrent protocol to copy and distribute the movie. It argues it needs early discovery to learn defendant's identity. Id.

Because many courts have already done so, the Court will refrain from describing the BitTorrent protocol here. See, e.g., Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v. Fung, 710 F.3d 1020, 1026-27 (9th Cir. 2013); Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-28, 295 F.R.D. 527, 529-30 (M.D. Fla. 2012).

A court has broad discretion in managing discovery. Klay v. All Defendants, 425 F.3d 977, 982 (11th Cir. 2005). A court may permit a party to conduct discovery before a Rule 26(f) conference. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1). Courts usually require a showing of good cause for early discovery. See TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Holden Prop. Servs., LLC, 299 F.R.D. 692, 694 (S.D. Fla. 2014); Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176, 270 F.R.D. 239, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); Dorrah v. United States, 282 F.R.D. 442, 445 (N.D. Iowa 2012).

Here, Plaintiff has established good cause for early discovery: it has sufficiently alleged infringement, it does not have another way to discover the putative infringer's identity to proceed with the litigation; and ISPs rarely maintain the information for long. The Court therefore GRANTS Plaintiff's motion, (Doc. 8), as follows:

1. Plaintiff may serve on Comcast Cable a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoena commanding the name, address, email address, and telephone number of the subscriber of the identified IP address. The subpoena must attach the complaint and this order.

2. Plaintiff may use the subscriber's information only to protect and enforce its rights set forth in the complaint.

3. If Comcast Cable is a "cable operator" under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), it must comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2), which permits a cable operator to disclose personal identifying information if the disclosure is "made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed," by sending a copy of this order to the defendant.

Section 522(5) defines a "cable operator" as "any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the management and operation of such a cable system." --------

DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on March 25, 2019.

/s/_________

PHILIP R. LAMMENS

United States Magistrate Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties


Summaries of

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Mar 25, 2019
Case No: 5:19-cv-102-Oc-30PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2019

Citations

Case No: 5:19-cv-102-Oc-30PRL (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2019)