From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
22 Civ. 10695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10695 (AT)

12-21-2022

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 98.7.197.51, Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of eveiy action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
22 Civ. 10695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 10695 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)