From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stricklin v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
21-cv-04511-SI (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-04511-SI

12-17-2021

ALIVIA JENEEN STRICKLIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS

SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 23, 2021, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. Dkt. No. 16 (Motion to Dismiss). Pro se plaintiffs opposition to the motion to dismiss was due on December 17, 2021. See Docket Entry for Dkt. No. 16 (“Responses due by 12/7/2021.”). To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. However, on December 17, 2021, plaintiff contacted the undersigned's courtroom deputy saying plaintiff did not receive the motion to dismiss until November 27, 2021, she thought she had 14 business days to file an opposition, and she would be filing an untimely opposition.

In light of this, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:
Plaintiffs response to the motion to dismiss must be filed on or before January 7, 2022.
Defendant's reply shall be filed on or before January 14, 2022.
The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss shall be held on January 28, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Stricklin v. United States

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
21-cv-04511-SI (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Stricklin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ALIVIA JENEEN STRICKLIN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

21-cv-04511-SI (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)