From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Strickland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1984
456 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

reasoning that " trial judge may not, on a motion for summary judgment, make determinations involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses."

Summary of this case from Brockman v. Avaya, Inc.

Opinion

No. 84-840.

September 28, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hendry County, James R. Adams, J.

Thomas C. Chase of Allen, Knudsen, Swartz, DeBoest, Rhoads Edwards, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellant.

Geraldyne H. Carlton of Carlton Carlton, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.


Appellant, Richard Crosby Strickland, appeals the partial summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, Barbara J. Strickland. We agree with appellant's contention that the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment in favor of appellee on the issue of liability and reverse the trial court's order.

This is a paternity action whereby appellee sought to have appellant declared the father of her child. Appellant made several motions to add parties and compel medical examinations, all of which were denied on the basis of the results of appellant's Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) reading which indicated a 99.03% probability that he was the father of the child. In the depositions filed in support of the motion for partial summary judgment, two physicians testified that the results of appellant's HLA test were not conclusive proof of paternity.

A trial judge may not, on a motion for summary judgment, make determinations involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses. The party moving for summary judgment must successfully meet the burden of proving conclusively the nonexistence of genuine issues of material facts. Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1979); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). Proof of a high degree of probability does not meet that burden. Accordingly, the partial summary judgment entered in favor of appellee is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Strickland v. Strickland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 28, 1984
456 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

reasoning that " trial judge may not, on a motion for summary judgment, make determinations involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses."

Summary of this case from Brockman v. Avaya, Inc.

reasoning that " trial judge may not, on a motion for summary judgment, make determinations involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses."

Summary of this case from Pacific Employers Ins. v. Wausau Business Ins. Co.

reasoning that " trial judge may not, on a motion for summary judgment, make determinations involving the weight of the evidence or the credibility of witnesses."

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. United A. Ins. Co., Inc.
Case details for

Strickland v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CROSBY STRICKLAND, APPELLANT, v. BARBARA J. STRICKLAND, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 28, 1984

Citations

456 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Sasson v. the Rockwell Manuf. Co.

Proof of a high degree of probability, even if compelling, does not satisfy the movant's burden on a motion…

Rymer v. Rymer

By this holding, we do not imply that the result of such a test is conclusively binding on the trier of fact.…