From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco
Feb 17, 1983
647 S.W.2d 70 (Tex. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 10-82-114-CV.

January 20, 1983. Rehearing Denied February 17, 1983.

Appeal from the 19th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Bill Logue, J.

Rose Anne Foster, Waco, for appellant.

Beverly A. Crowden, Waco-McLennan County Legal Aid, Nick A. Catoe, Jr., Heart of Texas Legal Services Corporation, Waco, for appellee.


OPINION


This is an appeal by David Strickland from a divorce decree rendered July 1, 1982. No statement of facts was timely filed and Appellant filed his motion for an extension of time under Rule 21c TRCP, 16 days late. This Court has no authority to consider a late motion for extension of time to file a statement of facts. B.D. Click Co., Inc. v. Safari Drilling Corp., Tex., 638 S.W.2d 860.

Appellant appeals asserting the trial court abused its discretion in 4 particulars.

In the absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and the judgment of the trial court. Levitz Furniture Co. v. State, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NRE, 471 S.W.2d 452; Englander v. Kennedy, Tex., 428 S.W.2d 806; Giddings v. Simpson, (Waco, Tex.Civ.App.) NWH, 532 S.W.2d 719.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Strickland v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco
Feb 17, 1983
647 S.W.2d 70 (Tex. App. 1983)
Case details for

Strickland v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:David Lee STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. Mary Laura STRICKLAND, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco

Date published: Feb 17, 1983

Citations

647 S.W.2d 70 (Tex. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Forest Lane Porsche-Audi v. Defries

In absence of a statement of facts it must be presumed on appeal that the evidence supports the verdict and…