From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 11, 2015
471 S.W.3d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77872

08-11-2015

Kevin B. Strickland, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent Kevin B. Strickland, Pro Se Appellant


Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent

Kevin B. Strickland, Pro Se Appellant

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kevin B. Strickland appeals the denial of his “Motion to Reopen Supreme Court Rule 27.26 Proceedings CV83–11316 Based on Abandonment by Counsel.” We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Strickland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 11, 2015
471 S.W.3d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Strickland v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin B. Strickland, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 11, 2015

Citations

471 S.W.3d 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Strickland v. State

--------Since 1987, Strickland has repeatedly filed a series of PCR motions and claims, all of which have…