From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Nurse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-2014-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No. 4:11-2014-JFA-TER

02-27-2012

James Stephen Strickland, a.k.a. James S. Strickland, Plaintiff, v. Nurse; Dr. Alewine, Head Doctor Broad River; Dr. Babb, Lieber CI; Padula, Lee Warden CI, Defendants.


ORDER

On January 20, 2012, the undersigned dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for lack of prosecution under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff now returns to this court with a one-page, almost illegible motion to reconsider the order dismissing his case. The plaintiff offers no explanation for his failure to bring his case into proper form, and thus, this court sees no reason to depart from its earlier order of dismissal. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 26) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 27, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Strickland v. Nurse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-2014-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Strickland v. Nurse

Case Details

Full title:James Stephen Strickland, a.k.a. James S. Strickland, Plaintiff, v. Nurse…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

C/A No. 4:11-2014-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)