From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
No. 3:11-cv-00444 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-00444

03-27-2013

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT STRICKLAND, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK & CO., INC. MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND LONG-TERM DISABILITY PROGRAM FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES, Defendants.


Judge Nixon


ORDER

The parties to this action have filed a Rule 41 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (Doc. No. 33.) They state that their stipulation to dismiss the lawsuit "does not preclude Plaintiff from filing a future lawsuit for long term disability benefits or ancillary benefits under the Plan for any claim that arose or accrued after February 28, 2011, following exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Plan." (Id.)Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Strickland v. Merck & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
No. 3:11-cv-00444 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Strickland v. Merck & Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SCOTT STRICKLAND, Plaintiff, v. MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-00444 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 27, 2013)