From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Kirkland Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-2257-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No. 4:11-2257-JFA-TER

02-27-2012

James Stephen Strickland, Petitioner, v. Kirkland Correctional Institution, Respondent.


ORDER

On November 9, 2011, the undersigned dismissed petitioner's second § 2254 petition because he had not received permission from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive § 2254 petition.

Plaintiff now returns to this court with a motion to appoint an attorney and for a new trial. As the original petition has been dismissed because this court has no jurisdiction to entertain a successive § 2254 petition, the petitioner's motion for counsel and a new trial (ECF No. 28) must be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 27, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Strickland v. Kirkland Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
C/A No. 4:11-2257-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Strickland v. Kirkland Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:James Stephen Strickland, Petitioner, v. Kirkland Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

C/A No. 4:11-2257-JFA-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)