From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-6047 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6047

06-26-2018

MARCO STRICKLAND, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J.C. HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Marco Strickland, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:17-hc-02092-D) Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marco Strickland, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marco Strickland, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strickland v. Holland, No. 5:17-hc-02092-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Strickland v. Holland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-6047 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Strickland v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:MARCO STRICKLAND, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J.C. HOLLAND, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6047 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)