From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strickland v. City of Auburn

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 6, 2023
2:22-cv-00528-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00528-JHC

01-06-2023

ENOSA STRICKLAND SR., and KATHLEEN KELIIKOA-STRICKLAND, individually, and as co-Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF ENOSA STRICKLAND JR., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AUBURN, a Municipality; KENNETH LYMAN, individually, Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Parties' Third LCR Joint Submission Regarding Protective Order Re Proportionality of Plaintiffs' Requests. Dkt. # 25. The Court has reviewed the submission, the related filings, and the balance of the case file. Being fully advised, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's motion as follows:

Regarding Requests for Production (RFPs) Nos. 9, 13 & 35, the motion is DENIED.

Regarding RFPs Nos. 15, 16, 17 & 18, the motion is GRANTED.

Regarding the preservation letter, the motion is DENIED. The letter does not govern Defendant's obligation to preserve; the applicable law so governs.


Summaries of

Strickland v. City of Auburn

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 6, 2023
2:22-cv-00528-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Strickland v. City of Auburn

Case Details

Full title:ENOSA STRICKLAND SR., and KATHLEEN KELIIKOA-STRICKLAND, individually, and…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 6, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00528-JHC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 6, 2023)