Summary
In Streppone v. Lennon (143 N.Y. 626) it appeared that there was a provision in the building contract that the contractor would do a certain amount of brick work. It was held that the covenant to do brick work might mean simply to do the work, or it might be construed as an agreement also to furnish the brick, and that parol evidence of the conversations of the parties at the time of the making of the contract was competent.
Summary of this case from Bird v. BeckwithOpinion
Argued June 6, 1894
Decided June 19, 1894
James Kearney for appellant.
Lorenzo Ullo for respondent.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.