From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strege v. Uranium One

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23-CV-10711 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-10711 (LTS)

01-02-2024

ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff, v. URANIUM ONE, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge

On December 27, 2023, the Court received a “motion to dismiss” from Plaintiff, advising that he wishes to withdraw his complaint. (ECF 6.)

The Court grants Plaintiff's request to withdraw this action. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). This order closes this case.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strege v. Uranium One

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23-CV-10711 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Strege v. Uranium One

Case Details

Full title:ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff, v. URANIUM ONE, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

23-CV-10711 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)