From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strege v. McDonalds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01947-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01947-REB-KMT

11-04-2013

ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALDS, WELLS FARGO BANK, TRIVIS, INC., JAN STREGE DEUTCHMAN, and DALE STREGE, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#23], filed September 10, 2013. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

"[#23]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#23], filed September 10, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as orders of this court;

2. That plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the duly issued orders of the court and Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1A.;

3. That judgment without prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, McDonalds; Wells Fargo Bank; Trivis, Inc.; Jan Strege Deutchman; and Dale Strege, against plaintiff, Adam Strege, on all claims for relief and causes of action; and

4. That this case is DISMISSED.

Dated November 4, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Strege v. McDonalds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01947-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Strege v. McDonalds

Case Details

Full title:ADAM STREGE, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALDS, WELLS FARGO BANK, TRIVIS, INC., JAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 4, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01947-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Nov. 4, 2013)