From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Street Corp. v. City of Cleveland

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 10, 1941
38 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio 1941)

Opinion

No. 28832

Decided December 10, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Accretion — Boundary line of property fixed at right angles to shore line — As of date land Torrenized — Not according to old natural shore line — Appeal — Adjoining owner dismissed as party — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, director of law, Mr. Arthur E. Griffith and Mr. David C. Meck, Jr., for appellee, city of Cleveland.

Mr. Ezra Z. Shapiro and Mr. Milton J. Harris, for appellee, Universal Terminal Company.

Messrs. Lindemann Ziegler and Mr. Frank Wilke, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Street Corp. v. City of Cleveland

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 10, 1941
38 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio 1941)
Case details for

Street Corp. v. City of Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:LAKE FRONT EAST FIFTY-FIFTH STREET CORP., APPELLEE v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 10, 1941

Citations

38 N.E.2d 410 (Ohio 1941)
38 N.E.2d 410

Citing Cases

Kincaid v. Yount

The courts have held that these provisions bind the state and all political subdivisions in the state.…