From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Streckenbach v. Dittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Sep 25, 2013
Case No. 13-C-269 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-C-269

2013-09-25

CHRISTOPHER S. STRECKENBACH, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, Warden, Redgranite Correctional Institution, Respondent.


DECISION AND ORDER

Christopher Streckenbach has filed an amended petition in response to the Court's order directing him to do so. Although not exactly a model of clarity, the Court finds that it satisfies the requirements of Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Court is also unable to conclude that Streckenbach is not entitled to relief. Id., Rule 4. Therefore, the respondent should file an answer or other responsive pleading within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 25th day of September, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

________

HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Streckenbach v. Dittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Sep 25, 2013
Case No. 13-C-269 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Streckenbach v. Dittman

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER S. STRECKENBACH, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-C-269 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 25, 2013)