From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Streck v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 20, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00439 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00439

11-20-2020

ANGELIKA STRECK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


MEM ORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On November 4, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 18, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: November 20, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Streck v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 20, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00439 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Streck v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ANGELIKA STRECK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00439 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 2020)