From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strbac v. Sniezek

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 24, 2007
CASE NO. 4:06CV2321 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:06CV2321.

May 24, 2007


ORDER


On September 25, 2006, Petitioner Thomas Strbac ("Strbac") filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that the Bureau of Prisons improperly failed to credit him with four months towards the completion of his sixteen-month sentence. This court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli for preparation of a Report and Recommendation ("R R"). On December 12, 2006, Thomas Sniezek ("Sniezek") filed a motion to dismiss the case. (Doc. No. 8.) Both parties filed briefs in support of their respective positions. Judge Vecchiarelli then submitted her R R on January 8, 2007, recommending that the court grant Sniezek's motion. Strbac filed objections to the R R on January 12, 2007. (Doc. No. 15.)

The court finds, after careful de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's R R and all other relevant documents, that the Magistrate Judge's conclusions are fully supported by the record and controlling case law. Accordingly, the court adopts as its own the Magistrate Judge's R R. (Doc. No. 13.) Sniezek's motion to dismiss is hereby granted with prejudice. The court further certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strbac v. Sniezek

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 24, 2007
CASE NO. 4:06CV2321 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Strbac v. Sniezek

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS STRBAC, Petitioner, v. THOMAS R. SNIEZEK, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 24, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 4:06CV2321 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Institution

28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) was adopted as part of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which, as a number of courts…

Reyes v. Pugh

A court should not grant a motion to dismiss "unless it appears beyond a doubt that the plaintiff can prove…