From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straw v. Kloecker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 5, 2017
Case No. 14 C 1420 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 5, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 14 C 1420

10-05-2017

ANDREW U. D. STRAW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN F. KLOECKER, and LOCKE LORD LLP, Defendants.


SUPPLEMENT TO OCTOBER 4 , 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Immediately before the Conclusion section of this Court's October 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order (the "Opinion"), this Court addressed the "Affidavit To Support Recusal Under 28 U.S.C. §144" filed on September 28 by pro se plaintiff Andrew Straw ("Straw"). Although for convenience the discussion in the Opinion at its pages 6 and 7 employed a shorthand reference to that filing as the "Recusal Motion," this Court's review of the case docket has revealed that the Clerk's Office did not treat that filing as a pending motion (see Dkt. No. 39).

Nonetheless it is exceedingly plain that the assertions made by Straw in that filing are, as the Opinion concluded at page 7, "totally irrational." Accordingly, to complete the record, this supplement to the Opinion confirms that this Court has rejected the proposed recusal.

/s/_________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge Dated: October 5, 2017


Summaries of

Straw v. Kloecker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 5, 2017
Case No. 14 C 1420 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Straw v. Kloecker

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW U. D. STRAW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN F. KLOECKER, and LOCKE LORD LLP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

Citations

Case No. 14 C 1420 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 5, 2017)