Opinion
Submitted May 28, 1937 —
Decided September 22, 1937.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 117 N.J.L. 45.
For the respondent, Howard K. Shaw.
For the appellants, Joseph R. Megill.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, COLE, JJ. 9.
For reversal — CASE, HEHER, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, JJ. 4.