From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 9, 1964
167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33367.

September 9, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones Gay, and Bette Towers Miller, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Harry T. Gray, George Stelljes, Jr., and Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy Gibbs, Jacksonville, for Tidewater Auchter Co., Barnes Slater, Jacksonville, for George D. Auchter Co., Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 9, 1964
167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Company

Case Details

Full title:SHELLIE T. STRATTON, PETITIONER, v. TIDEWATER AUCHTER COMPANY, GEORGE D…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 9, 1964

Citations

167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964)