From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stratton v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
20-CV-2037 JLS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-2037 JLS (NLS)

09-28-2022

MAUREEN STRATTON, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant.


(ECF No. 62)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 7, 2022 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

HON. JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 7, 2022, the Court ordered the Parties to show cause why this closed matter should not be dismissed with prejudice. See generally ECF No. 62 (“OSC”). Specifically, the Court provided the Parties ten days within which to respond to the OSC and cautioned them: “Should no Party respond to this Order, or should the Parties file an Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment, within the aforementioned timeframe, the Court will dismiss this matter with prejudice.See id. at 2 (emphasis in original). Despite more than ten days having elapsed since the issuance of the OSC, no response nor Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment has been filed by any Party.

Thus, in accordance with the September 7, 2022 OSC, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the above-named action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stratton v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
20-CV-2037 JLS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Stratton v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN STRATTON, Plaintiff, v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

20-CV-2037 JLS (NLS) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)