From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stratton v. Intoccia

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 31, 2022
343 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D22-0810

08-31-2022

Steven STRATTON, et al., Appellants, v. Christina INTOCCIA, et al., Appellees.

Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather & Littky-Rubin, LLP, and Julie H. Littky-Rubin (West Palm Beach), for appellants. Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and James H. Wyman, for appellees.


Clark, Fountain, La Vista, Prather & Littky-Rubin, LLP, and Julie H. Littky-Rubin (West Palm Beach), for appellants.

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and James H. Wyman, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellees (Defendants below) Christina and Louise Intoccia commendably concede that the trial court erred in dismissing the case without considering the factors set forth in Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1993). We accept Appellees’ confession of error, reverse the order of dismissal, and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Stratton v. Intoccia

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 31, 2022
343 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Stratton v. Intoccia

Case Details

Full title:Steven STRATTON, et al., Appellants, v. Christina INTOCCIA, et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

343 So. 3d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)