From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stratton-Crooke v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 5, 2021
8:20-cv-730-WFJ-JSS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2021)

Opinion

8:20-cv-730-WFJ-JSS

08-05-2021

JAMES STRATTON-CROOKE, Plaintiff, v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised by the Notice of Settlement (Dkt. 22) that the above-styled action has been settled. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 3.09, M.D.Fla., it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 60-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and to CLOSE the file.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Stratton-Crooke v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 5, 2021
8:20-cv-730-WFJ-JSS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Stratton-Crooke v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES STRATTON-CROOKE, Plaintiff, v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 5, 2021

Citations

8:20-cv-730-WFJ-JSS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2021)