From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strand v. Harville

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 30, 2022
2:21-CV-159-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-159-RLJ-CRW

08-30-2022

ROBERT SAMUEL STRAND, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HARVILLE, CHRIS HARVILLE, and CHARLES GOINS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

Leon Jordan United States District Judge

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Plaintiff's pro se complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because the Court has CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT


Summaries of

Strand v. Harville

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 30, 2022
2:21-CV-159-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Strand v. Harville

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SAMUEL STRAND, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HARVILLE, CHRIS HARVILLE, and…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-159-RLJ-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2022)