Opinion
(1793.)
In case. The judgment was ideo consideratum est quod quaerens recuperaret; and reversed; it ought to have been quod recuperet. H. 2 Car.rot., 121, vel 122; Bendl., 193.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Strand v. Blunden
Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 784 (N.C. 1793)
Summaries of
Strand v. Blunden
Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 784 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for
Strand v. Blunden
Case Details
Full title:STRAND v. BLUNDEN. — Trin. 3 Car
Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Date published: Jan 1, 1793
Citations
1 N.C. 784 (N.C. 1793)