From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Straite v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 2, 2023
1:15CV910 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

1:15CV910 1:11 CR321-1

08-02-2023

MONTE EMMANUEL STRAITE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), (ECF No. 142), and, on July 6, 2023, was served on the parties in this action, (see ECF No. 143). Petitioner filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. (ECF No. 144.)

The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Rule 59(e) Motion, (ECF No. 138), and his Rule 60(b)(1) Motion, (ECF No. 140), are DENIED.

Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.


Summaries of

Straite v. United States

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 2, 2023
1:15CV910 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Straite v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MONTE EMMANUEL STRAITE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

1:15CV910 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2023)