From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strader v. State

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Dec 21, 2021
No. 21-3275-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

21-3275-SAC

12-21-2021

JAMES C. STRADER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAM A. CROW U.S. SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the court on plaintiff's combined motion to appoint federal prosecution [sic] for criminal charges and motion to dismiss without prejudice (Doc. 12).

Plaintiff's motion to appoint federal prosecutors to pursue unspecified criminal charges is denied. The decision to pursue criminal charges rests with prosecuting authorities and cannot be initiated by a private citizen. See Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973) (“A private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another.”); see also Winslow v. Romer, 759 F.Supp. 670, 673 (D. Colo. 1991)(“Private citizens generally have no standing to institute federal criminal proceedings.”).

Plaintiff also moves to dismiss this matter without prejudice. The court construes this as a motion filed under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and finds the motion should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED plaintiff's motion to appoint federal prosecution and motion to dismiss (Doc. 12) is denied in part and granted in part. The motion to appoint federal prosecution is denied. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss this matter without prejudice is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strader v. State

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Dec 21, 2021
No. 21-3275-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Strader v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES C. STRADER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

No. 21-3275-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 21, 2021)