From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strader v. Snider

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Sep 16, 2024
No. 24-3080-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 16, 2024)

Opinion

24-3080-JWL

09-16-2024

JAMES C. STRADER, Petitioner, v. LIBBY SNIDER, et al., Respondents


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This pro se habeas matter was dismissed without prejudice on September 12, 2024. (Doc. 11.) The same day, the Court received additional correspondence from Petitioner. (Doc. 13.) The Court has liberally construed and carefully reviewed the correspondence and attachments, which relate to conditions of confinement. As previously explained to Petitioner, a federal habeas case is not the proper avenue by which to make claims regarding conditions of confinement. (See Doc. 8, p. 4-5.) Because the information contained in Petitioner's latest correspondence does not alter any of the conclusions that are set out in the Court's memorandum and order dismissing this matter without prejudice, no further action will be taken. This case remains closed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that no further action will be taken on Petitioner's correspondence (Doc. 13). This matter remains closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Strader v. Snider

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Sep 16, 2024
No. 24-3080-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Strader v. Snider

Case Details

Full title:JAMES C. STRADER, Petitioner, v. LIBBY SNIDER, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Sep 16, 2024

Citations

No. 24-3080-JWL (D. Kan. Sep. 16, 2024)