From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Strachon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 28, 1989
546 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-0444.

June 28, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Arthur J. Franza, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Margaret Good and Phyllis Malinski, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Sylvia Alonso and Diane E. Leeds, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.

GLICKSTEIN, J., dissents with opinion.


I would reverse and remand for new trial. The prosecutor, in the middle of the defense case, was able to inject belatedly the issue of appellant's probation status at the time of the commission of the crime. Her probation status should not have been brought to the jury's attention before it was established that it was relevant to her motive in committing the purported crime.

At oral argument, I suggested her motive was not relevant to the charge, anyway, this being murder in the second degree. Defense counsel has, subsequent to that argument, provided the court with supplemental authority to support that view. See State v. Evans, 432 So.2d 584 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).


Summaries of

Strachon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 28, 1989
546 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Strachon v. State

Case Details

Full title:MAUREEN STRACHON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 28, 1989

Citations

546 So. 2d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)