Opinion
19-CV-10212 (JPO)
08-20-2021
KAWAHN STRACHN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants.
ORDER
J. Paul Oetken, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Kawahn Strachn filed his amended complaint against Defendants City of New York, Frias Railyng, Officer Gomez, and Lieutenant Edmonds on November 21, 2019. (Dkt. No. 7.) The docket does not indicate that Plaintiff has served Defendants Gomez and Edmonds. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a defendant to be served with the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed.
Plaintiff is directed to advise the Court in writing whether he intends to serve and pursue his claims against Defendants Gomez and Edmonds, notwithstanding the dismissal of the claims against Defendants City of New York and Railyng. If no communication is received by September 3, 2021, indicating Plaintiff's plans and showing good cause as to why service upon Defendants Gomez and Edmonds was not made within 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.