From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stowers v. Westmoreland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 2008
305 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1699.

Submitted: November 13, 2008.

Decided: November 18, 2008.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (07-678-BLA).

Carl A. Stowers, Petitioner Pro Se. William Steele Mattingly, Jackson Kelly, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Sean Gregory Bajkowski, Rita Ann Roppolo, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Carl A. Stowers seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901- 945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Stowers v. Westmoreland Coal Co., Inc., No. 07-0678-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

Stowers v. Westmoreland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 2008
305 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Stowers v. Westmoreland

Case Details

Full title:Carl A. STOWERS, Petitioner, v. WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 18, 2008

Citations

305 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2008)