From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stowell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Sep 11, 2020
301 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-1719

09-11-2020

Michael STOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Michael Stowell, Madison, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Michael Stowell, Madison, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Michael Stowell's conviction and sentence. We remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order finding Michael Stowell competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to when the trial court court made its oral finding of competency. See Arnold v. State , 295 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Anders v. State of California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Stowell v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Sep 11, 2020
301 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Stowell v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 11, 2020

Citations

301 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)